Administrative law judges, adjudicators, and hearing officers
Typically requires Doctoral or professional degree
What is this page & how do I use it?
This is a research report for one career — the kind an analyst would write for a stock. The rating at the top is the neutral baseline (same for everyone); below it come the cases for and against, how the last official forecast for this career actually aged, and what the education path costs and pays.
How to use it: read the bulls-vs-bears case, then hit Score this career to weigh it against your other options with your own interests factored in.
Analyst take: Decent prospects — -0.7% projected growth, moderate AI exposure (50/100).
Moat (borrowed from investing — the water that defends a castle): how shielded this career is from AI. None = broadly exposed — many of its tasks are automatable and its skills are widely shared. (Exposure ≠ job loss; see the bears below.)
The small grid is a style box (borrowed from Morningstar’s fund reports): the blue square places this career on reward (top row = high) versus risk (left column = low), against all 730 careers. Medium uncertainty means the score leans partly on forward-looking bets like AI exposure, so treat the exact number loosely.
- +High pay — above 92% of careers ($115,230).
- −Projected to shrink (-0.7%).
In 2014, the U.S. government projected -3.3% growth for this career by 2024. What actually happened: +16.7%. Reality beat the forecast — a reminder that every number on this page is an estimate, and this is how the last one aged. Full back-test →
Education & ROI — how to get here
Real outcomes for the college majors that feed this occupation, across 36 bachelor’s programs.
Earnings & debt from the U.S. Dept. of Education College Scorecard; majors mapped to this occupation via the NCES CIP→SOC crosswalk. A grounded ROI snapshot, not a guarantee — pay varies widely by school and specialty.