Skip to content
← Back to explore

Construction

Explosives workers, ordnance handling experts, and blasters

Typically requires High school diploma or equivalent

What is this page & how do I use it?

This is a research report for one career — the kind an analyst would write for a stock. The rating at the top is the neutral baseline (same for everyone); below it come the cases for and against, how the last official forecast for this career actually aged, and what the education path costs and pays.

How to use it: read the bulls-vs-bears case, then hit Score this career to weigh it against your other options with your own interests factored in.

CareerStar rating
RiskyLow uncertainty

Analyst take: Softer prospects — -0.9% projected growth, low AI exposure (14/100).

37
/ 100
low riskhigh
top row = high reward

Moat (borrowed from investing — the water that defends a castle): how shielded this career is from AI. Narrow = some shelter, but AI can reach a real share of its tasks.

The small grid is a style box (borrowed from Morningstar’s fund reports): the blue square places this career on reward (top row = high) versus risk (left column = low), against all 730 careers. Low uncertainty means the score leans mostly on measured data (growth, pay) rather than forward-looking bets, so it's comparatively solid.

🐂 Bulls say
  • +Low AI exposure — resilient (14% of tasks exposed).
🐻 Bears say
  • Projected to shrink (-0.9%).
Was this rating fair?
Projected growth
-0.9%
Median pay
$59,110
AI exposure
14/100
share of tasks exposed to AI — not job loss

What this work involves

constructiontradeshands-on